It is saddening that elections in Kenya tend to be a zero sum game. It is something that the 2010 constitution was meant to somewhat cure with its elaborate focus on addressing what ailed the country. Thus the constitution spoke to national values, to land issues, to social liberties among others. And yet still at critical moments it appears that the nation is as divided as ever.
In a country that boasts majority Christians it has been a nail biting experience witnessing how many pastors and preachers confessed that they found preaching last Sunday, the first Sunday after the announcement of election results, fairly difficult. Why so? Equally surprising was the number of Christians, on the one hand who were excited to go to church to give thanks for the successful conclusion of the elections and on the other those who found it difficult to go to church to worship.
That the country is as divided as ever along tribal lines has not in doubt. When the former minister for interior and coordination, Maj Gen Joseph Nkaissery died, the mourners from the Maa community spoke of him not first as a Kenyan but rather how the Maa community and secondly Kenya was in mourning. In quite a few of the statements issued they made reference to the recent deaths of leading members of the community including the late William ole Ntimama and John Keen among others.
This past week has particularly been a stark reminder of the divide in the nation. Social media was abuzz with information that there were social disturbances in Kisumu and other pockets in the nation. Initially, these were hardly covered by the media, some which featured cartoons, as the information circulated.
Our media are often quick to pick social media conversation. Large segments in news bulletins are often dedicated to the reading of random tweets. It was therefore curious that this time round the media was rather studiously indifferent to the charter on social media.
When the media began to pick up the conversation the voices appeared as stark along the ethnic divide as only Kenya can provide. Government officials only acknowledged criminal elements who were attempting to break into private business premises and were then repulsed by security agencies. Leaders from other state agencies, notably National Cohesion and Integration Commission, charged with the task of bridging the gap in the nation seemed to have not picked up any challenges across the nation. Really?
It seemed it was left to the leaders of the regions that were going through these social disturbances to speak out. The challenge for the nation is whether in Kenya there is a common prism through which to perceive reality or whether that reality is forever colored in the shade of tribe.
In one of the church services in town, a prominent minister of the gospel offered that on the issues the nation was going through his church was neutral. That was a hollow statement. Once the IEBC released the results of the elections one can not be neutral particularly after acknowledging that the electoral body had done all that was humanly possible to preside over credible elections. Similarly, one cant be neutral to the suffering in society. It is hard to imagine how a minister can be neutral when a mother sits in the front pew mourning the death of a child.
How shall we bridge the divide in the nation so that national issues are not processed through the prism of tribe? It has been often acknowledged how progressive the 2010 constitution is. But may be it is not progressive enough for this country.
We must go back to the drawing board and acknowledge the peculiarities of our country and the fact that these unique features require us to think of a unique design that will address our shortcomings and bring out the best in us. When the constitutional debate was going on, reference was consistently made to models operating elsewhere whether presidential system or parliamentary system. But may be none of them suits us.
We pride ourselves in being one of the more sophisticated nations in the continent. We are unique, that has to be granted. We boast one of the more successful athletics teams in the world, our workforce is professional and well trained, we have a country that is so amazing in its beauty and on and on we can go. How come we can not marshal these resources to speak to our existential threat: selfish ethnic consciousness.
It is our tragedy that our institutions such as the media, the religious lot, civil and state agencies come short and like all the rest of the nation, assume the prism of selfish ethnic consciousness as their default mode every moment we have a chance to rise above the ethnic divide.