Experiencing Tweeting with Others

Twitting is an exciting experience. To the extent that it is a real time chart one is able to engage not only with the individuals one is in conversation with but to follow the threads of thought that may come from other sources. These threads of thought could inform the conversation that is ongoing. During my conversation I was, at the same time, following CNN, BBC and of course the football conversation around two EPL Teams, Liverpool and Arsenal. (For those behind news Liverpool beat Chelsea last weekend and Arsenal lost to Newcastle).
Probably the most frustrating part was my inability to actually engage in live conversation at the same speed and pace as others. Previously I had sent an occasional tweet and did not often wait to see it posted. But this time I needed to engage in the conversation and it was frustrating to have time lapse between the conversation – in a sense I felt like I lost the thread of the conversation.
Setting up the tweet and other details was not hard, however, selecting the threads to follow open a wide choice that was slightly confusing. On any given topic there are myriad individuals who are offering opinion. For a rookie it is hard to make a decision as to who to follow, who would have substantive content to share on the tweet. So for the beginning it was simply a matter of guess week. That is why I stayed with the traditional trusted news brands, BBC, CNN and even on football I stayed with the official sites because I think they would most probably be authentic. So overall that was an interesting experience.
Previously I have used tweets for teaching news reporting. I found it particularly useful in writing leads. When students are instructed to limit their leads to a certain number of characters some do not adhere to the limit. But tweeting forces them to do so, so they have to have sharper leads. In spite of the challenges that I faced in today’s experience I still think I gained some ideas that would be applicable in my j-classes.

Advertisements

Experiences Shooting a Documentary Project

Marceline, Martin and Wanjiru have had an eye opening experience shooting a documentary. It is the first they have done together, and has provided them with the opportunity to consider where their training is leading them. Here is the story as Marceline tells it: Experiences of Students on a docu shoot

Images in a Day

This slideshow requires JavaScript.

Matthew Busiega

Matthew is an amazingly jovial man with a ready smile, who gets along with nearly every one. When he is at Daystar University’s main town campus, his will probably be the first smile you meet. Genial and helpful, he leaves a lasting impression. It is no wonder that he makes friends easily. Here is the interview with Matthew Busiega

Remembering Rwanda

Mediastorm hosts many stories that cut right into the heart of an individual. The stories are powerfully told, both from a narrative point of view but also from the visuals. The individuals who tell these tragic stories, who have survived many of life’s challenges, are framed in a dignified way – their beauty still shining through the sorrow that scars their skin. One would want to enjoy visiting the site but the power of the stories leave a visitor frozen wondering about the world we leave in.

Intended Consequences, featuring the Rwanda genocide, is one such story. The stories of women who were raped repeatedly; forced to drink blood; left for dead in the middle of other dead bodies in church, in the riverbed and in other places; infected with HIV virus and some surviving to face uncertain life is matched with the dark background setting of the website.  It draws attention to the plight of these Rwandese, to take note of the fact that while the genocide happened the world stood by, and in the word of one of the narrators now the world should “come to support us as we deal with the legacy of genocide”.  The stories are moving and there are links to enable one respond to this story.

The setting of the website and of the story demands a response from the viewer.  The pictorial is a mixture of still and motion pictures blending beautifully. The inclusion of other stories on the right side of the page allows the viewer to move on to a different story if one cannot bear the grimness of the story one is viewing. But there is also a provision for involvement. On the left side of the page there is provision to comment, to share the story with others or to post it on one’s own website or blog by embedding it in the text. A click on a link provides one with instructions on how to get involved, for example, by reporting abuses to Amnesty International. But it also has provision for downloading the transcript besides only listening to the audio and viewing the visuals.

At the top bar the viewer can click on the contributor’s link that leads to the bios of the authors. But it also has provision for people to submit any stories that they might have to the sight. I would have loved it to have a link to the individual victims so that one can read their profiles too – how they coped after and where they are now.

This story is both multimedia i.e. there is the transcript that can be printed, there are visuals and also audio; but it is also interactive. You can embed it; you can send it to others and also asks the viewer to do something in response to this story.

Musing over Online Journalism in Kenya

Kenya is one of the active media markets in Africa – but this activity is largely limited to print and electronic i.e. television and radio media. This tradition is influenced by the media model the country adopted at independence about 50 years ago. While in most African countries government or the ruling party had a significant say in what format the media structure assumed, Kenya’s was left to a market system so much so that, apart from the national broadcaster which loosely is modeled after the BBC, the newspapers, the radio and television stations in the country are all commercial.

However, the government, until very recently, had fairly a strong hold over the airwaves. The loosening of the government influence over this began about 20 years ago. But the system of liberalizing the airwaves was strongly controlled by the government with the result that there was no competition among the players. Consequently, the cost of accessing internet remained fairly high in Kenya. It is only in the last couple of years that competition, coupled with the landing of fibre optic at the port of Mombasa, is beginning to lead to reduced cost of accessing ICT.

Typical of developing nations, however, the thin spread of other enabling infrastructures such as electricity and access to the country side has meant that there is less access of internet in the countryside. This has impacted the media in the sense that there has been slow uptake of online journalism across the country.

The leading media houses, the Nation Media Group and the Standard Group are accessible online. However, to my mind the practice on their websites is largely posting of content that had appeared either in their newspaper or the loading of their TV content on their website. Basically, they have the same clip from the TV posted on the website. It is not a case where a reporter does a hard copy version and prepares an audio or video version of the same story that would then be posted online.

Since the liberalization of access to airwaves and the adoption of a more democratic process in acquiring frequencies, there are many radio and TV stations in the country. Most of them have online presence. But again, the postings on the sites consist of uploading previously broadcast content, or streaming live broadcast.

The Nation website does have a photo gallery and a discussion site where readers can post comments. The Standard has an online editorial team. But the stories the Standard team posts are specifically written for that online audience presumably targeting Kenyans in the diaspora.

Hello world!

Welcome to WordPress.com. This is your first post. Edit or delete it and start blogging!

Next Newer Entries